mmk2410
/
mmk2410.org
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Releases Wiki Activity

🐛 [Post/Fix] Publishing my Emacs Configuration using Gitea Actions 

Fix image paths
This commit is contained in:
Marcel Kapfer 2023-04-02 13:32:35 +02:00
parent 36a8957316
commit 4e81fa7451
Signed by: mmk2410
GPG Key ID: CADE6F0C09F21B09
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
content-org/blog.org
View File

@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ I followed to [[https://blog.gitea.io/2023/03/hacking-on-gitea-actions/][Guide f
Given a successful runner installation and configuration, it is necessary to activate the Gitea Actions for the =dot-emacs= repository. Given a successful runner installation and configuration, it is necessary to activate the Gitea Actions for the =dot-emacs= repository.
[[file:~/Code/mmk2410.org/static/2023/2023-04-02-activate-actions.png]] [[file:../static/2023/2023-04-02-activate-actions.png]]
Then I needed to declare some secrets for the publish job to deploy the changes to my server using =rsync=. At the moment I keep using the =gitlab-ci= user I already created and configured it. So I copied the four secrets =SSH_PRIVATE_KEY=, =SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS=, =SSH_PORT= and =SSH_USER= from GitLab to Gitea. If you're following, along save the variables somewhere else (e.g. a password store) since contrary to GitLab you are not able to view or edit Gitea Secrets after saving them. Then I needed to declare some secrets for the publish job to deploy the changes to my server using =rsync=. At the moment I keep using the =gitlab-ci= user I already created and configured it. So I copied the four secrets =SSH_PRIVATE_KEY=, =SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS=, =SSH_PORT= and =SSH_USER= from GitLab to Gitea. If you're following, along save the variables somewhere else (e.g. a password store) since contrary to GitLab you are not able to view or edit Gitea Secrets after saving them.
[[file:~/Code/mmk2410.org/static/2023/2023-04-02-set-secrets.png]] [[file:../static/2023/2023-04-02-set-secrets.png]]
Now I can add and push my new Gitea workflow configuration, which I placed in the repository at =.gitea/workflows/publish.yaml=. Now I can add and push my new Gitea workflow configuration, which I placed in the repository at =.gitea/workflows/publish.yaml=.
@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ Although the Gitea Action file is more verbose and longer than its GitLab equiva
Since the configuration is done and tested in a private repository with a modified upload path I removed the =.gitlab-ci.yml= file and push the changes to the Gitea repository. We can now see the running pipeline in the "Actions" tab. Since the configuration is done and tested in a private repository with a modified upload path I removed the =.gitlab-ci.yml= file and push the changes to the Gitea repository. We can now see the running pipeline in the "Actions" tab.
file:~/Code/mmk2410.org/static/2023/2023-04-02-running-action.png [[file:../static/2023/2023-04-02-running-action.png]]
And with a click on the job title we can see the detailed execution and finally some nice green checkmarks. And with a click on the job title we can see the detailed execution and finally some nice green checkmarks.
file:~/Code/mmk2410.org/static/2023/2023-04-02-running-action-details.png [[file:../static/2023/2023-04-02-running-action-details.png]]
Interestingly, the whole run takes only 11s on Gitea compared to about 33s on GitLab.com. I don't know if the reason for this is the platform itself or the restriction of the public runners on GitLab.com. Interestingly, the whole run takes only 11s on Gitea compared to about 33s on GitLab.com. I don't know if the reason for this is the platform itself or the restriction of the public runners on GitLab.com.